Lately JP seems to be just thrown together. Randy's page is a joke. Does he know an LED is a diode(light emitting diode)? Why does a diode need to be protected by another diode? It doesn't because diodes used in 12 volt circuits are rated high enough to handle reverse voltages that might arise. The guy is an idiot and he insults our intelligence. I could write much better articles that would actually be helpful. Also, why is Bree leaving? And last but not least how did you guys do the history of the CJ and not even mention an in-line six?

David Fincher
Electrical Technician  

I disagree. I can understand where your coming from but all in all JP is still the best magazine out today that gives honest answers and can make honest jokes about things. Name one other off road magazine that will tell you a product sucks or shows the negative side to modifying a vehicle. i have never read another magazine a laughed out loud from the comments made. Everybody is different in everyway and also entitled to his or her own opinion so im not trying to change your mind. Im just trying to help keep your mind open and accept that not every issue will be packed with what you want to see. Im a rubicon owner and agreed when they said its a vehicle they would not own because its true how most rubicon owners dont know *** except for what they read in the brocher. Thanks for reading my rant and I hope to not offened anyone.  

Were you reading JP when the first article came out about the new JK Wrangler? It totally slammed it. They bad mouthed the cv joints, the V6, and the new body. The very next mounth JP called the new Wrangler superior and much improved. That is poor journalism. I just don't trust their opinions because of mistakes. How can you do the history of the CJ and not mention the in-line six?(last issue) Don't they have editors?
                    Bowhunter2u  

They did the same when the rubicon came out by saying it was the most capable jeep ever made and that the engineers got it right but then came back after test driving it and said it wasnt as good as they thought. When I reread the articles on the JK it seemed that they bashed the specs but after driving it they liked it.    We could go back and fourth on this but to save time and anger I wanna agree with you that they arent the best editors. They do a good job with trying to put out as much info as they know and receive.  

Some people are just too funny...